'Rep By Pop' is a historical term in Canada, but it doesn't apply in Oxford
In baseball, if you hit .300 on a consistent basis you’re due for a large contract. In Oxford County Council, 30% for Woodstock simply doesn’t make sense and it’s not fair.
Woodstock has 3 seats on Oxford County Council, but a population much
higher than 30% of the overall county numbers. The format does give Woodstock 3
seats and the other 7 municipalities 1 apiece, which in-turn is also not proper
representation by population for Tillsonburg with 1 chair. Besides the 3 seats
for Woodstock each of Tillsonburg, Ingersoll, Zorra, East-Zorra Tavistock,
Blandford-Blenheim, Norwich and Southwest Oxford each have 1 for a grand total
of 10.
There are many population numbers floating around and the recent Stats Canada Census will produce more statistics.
According to Stats Canada, on April 1 of 2026, our nation’s population
was 41,417,056.
According to Stats Canada in 2021, the Oxford population was 139,345. The City of Woodstock was then over 46,700 or 33.5% of Oxford’s overall total, so Woodstock should have 1/3 of the chairs or perhaps 3 of 9.
A report on the Oxford website from January 1 of 2026 indicates Woodstock’s
population to now be above 55,000 – a release called “Population
& Household Counts - 2021 Census,
2025 Intercensal Population Estimate”.
With the County Council essentially
having 50% of its membership from urban (Woodstock, Tillsonburg and Ingersoll),
there still remains a disparity, but at the same time logic of urban versus
rural being equal.
Historical Perspectives
In Canadian history it was
‘rep by pop’ or ‘sectional equality’ and both became prevalent in discussion
around 1840 during the epoch of Upper Canada (Ontario / Canada West) and Lower
Canada (Quebec / Canada East). At the time of Confederation 25 years later it
was certainly a debate item once again with combatants like George Brown, John
A Macdonald and George-Etienne Cartier.
It’s very interesting to note
that Sir Francis Hincks of Oxford County was one of the founders of the Reform
Party and a former provincial premier. The premise was believed that compromise
could be established with “trust”, however equal representation between West and East
was no longer possible when Confederation included Nova Scotia and New
Brunswick.
I digress, but since
Hincks (Not listed anywhere as a Father of Confederation as he was the Governor
of British Guyana in 1867) was a promoter of the railway, therefore tracks reached
Woodstock in 1853 (Great Western Railway Company) when Hincks was Premier of the
Province of Canada.
Oxford County – Today
The City of Woodstock has
not had an Oxford Warden since Charlie Tatham from 1983-85. Simply said in 1 word is: wrong.
Among the many wardens
before Zorra’s Marcus Ryan (2023-26) include but not limited to: Don McKay
(East-Zorra Tavistock from 2011-14, Ed Down (Blandford-Blenheim from 1992-97),
Mark Harrison (Norwich from 1998-2000), David Oliphant (East-Zorra Tavistock
from 2001-03), Don Woolcott (Blandford-Blenheim from 2004-06), Paul Holbrough
(Ingersoll from 2007-10), Dave Mayberry (South-West Oxford from 2015-18) and
the previous tenure of Larry Martin (2018-2022) of Norwich Township. Mayberry
continues as the Mayor of South-West Oxford, but is retiring after Oct. 26.
In local politics we are always
impressed by the idea that Ernie Hardeman has sat as the Oxford MPP since 1995.
Hardeman was mayor of South-West Oxford and Warden of Oxford from 1989 – 91.
Again, Tatham was
Woodstock’s mayor and Warden of Oxford way back in 1983-85, and that’s wrong
that Woodstock has not had a Warden in 41 years. The 5 versus 5 format is certainly not
working.
Historical Look Back
By 1850, it was the District
of Brock which became Oxford County, but the geography was different as Burford,
Harley, Cathcart and Oakland were in Oxford until they soon shifted to Brant
County.
History depicts many
evolutions such as amalgamation of old township names like West Nissouri (Now
in Middlesex) along with Dereham, Blandford and Blenheim, North and South
Norwich and other configurations.
Today, in nearby Brant County
it’s impossible to have this upper and lower pyramid discussion scenario of
municipal and county levels as Brant County and Brantford are both 1-tier
systems. Brant County elects 1 mayor and has 5 wards. With 2 elected in each
ward, there are 11 on their 1-tier council. In Brantford, the set up is the
same with 1 mayor and then 2 elected in each of 5 wards.
Can the Oxford disparity be solved? The Province of Ontario could shuffle the deck as Queen’s Park dictates how municipal government operates and its structure. See: Section 225 & 238 of The Municipal Act, 2001.
(https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/01m25)
https://cdn.umb-sites.dev/county/media/qp4gm0yw/procedure-by-law-no-6268-2020-amendment-schedule.pdf
https://archives.oxfordcounty.ca/exhibits/wardens-and-council/county-wardens/
No comments:
Post a Comment